[Pankaj6in]

Hashing Algorithms SHA-256 and SHA-384 for Data Integrity Verification

Hashing algorithms like SHA-256 and SHA-384 are cryptographic functions used to ensure data integrity during storage, transmission, and authentication. They work by generating a fixed-size hash value (digest) from input data. Even a small change in the original data results in a completely different hash, making it easy to detect tampering or corruption

Understanding SHA-256 and SHA-384

• SHA-256: Part of the SHA-2 family, generates a 256-bit (32-byte) hash. It is widely used due to its balance of security and computational efficiency.
• SHA-384: Also part of SHA-2, produces a 384-bit (48-byte) hash, offering higher collision resistance, often used where stronger security is needed.
Both are one-way functions, meaning it’s practically impossible to reverse-engineer the original data from the hash.

Where Are These Needed?

1. Data Transmission over Networks
When data travels over public or private networks, it may be intercepted or altered. Network devices use SHA hashing to generate a checksum that accompanies the data. On arrival, the receiver calculates the hash again and compares it with the original. If they differ, the data has been altered.
• Cisco: Routers and firewalls often use SHA-256 in IPsec VPNs to verify integrity of data packets. For example, in a site-to-site VPN, Cisco ASA can use SHA-256 in the ESP (Encapsulating Security Payload) authentication phase.
• Juniper: Juniper SRX firewalls allow administrators to set security associations with SHA-256 or SHA-384 to protect data integrity in IPsec tunnels.

2. Software and Firmware Integrity Verification

Software updates, firmware, and application downloads often include a hash value published by the vendor. Users verify the downloaded file’s hash against the published one to ensure no tampering.
• Microsoft: Provides SHA-256 checksums for Windows ISO downloads so users can verify authenticity.
• Fortinet: Publishes firmware images with SHA-256 checksums so administrators can validate the file before upgrading a FortiGate firewall.

3. Digital Signatures and Certificates
In Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), SHA-256 or SHA-384 is often used to create a hash of the data before signing it with a private key. The recipient verifies the hash with the sender’s public key to confirm authenticity and integrity.
• Palo Alto Networks: Uses SHA-256 signed certificates for SSL/TLS inspection and secure administrative access.
• Check Point: Employs SHA-384 in its Gaia OS certificate management for environments requiring stronger cryptographic assurance.

4. File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
Security compliance frameworks (PCI-DSS, HIPAA) require regular verification of critical files. Hashes like SHA-256 are computed periodically to detect unauthorized modifications.
• Tripwire: Uses SHA-256 for FIM to detect unauthorized changes in system files.
• Qualys: Uses SHA-256 in its policy compliance module to monitor changes in critical files across systems.

5. Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies
Blockchains depend on hashing for immutability. In Bitcoin, every block contains a SHA-256 hash of the previous block, ensuring a secure chain. Ethereum uses Keccak-256, a variant of SHA-3, but many blockchain-based products still rely on SHA-256 or SHA-384 for certain verification tasks.
• IBM Hyperledger Fabric: Can be configured to use SHA-256 for block data hashing.
• AWS Managed Blockchain: Supports SHA-256 integrity verification in its Hyperledger and Ethereum implementations.

6. Authentication Systems
Instead of storing plain-text passwords, systems store their hashed versions. SHA-256 or SHA-384 can be used to hash passwords before storage. Even if the database is compromised, attackers can’t easily retrieve the original password.
• Linux: Modern distributions allow using SHA-256 or SHA-512 for password hashing in /etc/shadow.
• Oracle Database: Supports SHA-384 password hashing for compliance with FIPS 140-2 security standards.

7. Secure API Communications
APIs transmitting sensitive data often use hashing to sign requests. This ensures that the request body hasn’t been altered in transit.
• Amazon Web Services (AWS): Signs API requests using SHA-256 HMAC to validate integrity.
• Google Cloud: Uses SHA-256 in OAuth token signing and verification.

Why Choose SHA-256 vs SHA-384?
• SHA-256: Faster, less computationally heavy, ideal for general-purpose applications like VPNs, file integrity checks, and software verification.
• SHA-384: More secure, higher collision resistance, preferred in highly sensitive environments like government or defense systems where longer digest size reduces collision risk further.

Example Scenario
Imagine a company setting up an IPsec VPN between a Cisco ASA firewall and a Juniper SRX for branch office connectivity. They choose:
• Integrity algorithm: SHA-256
• Encryption algorithm: AES-256
When a packet leaves Site A, Cisco ASA computes a SHA-256 hash of the packet’s data. Upon arrival at Site B, Juniper SRX recomputes the hash. If they match, the packet is accepted; if not, it is discarded. This ensures that no one has tampered with the data during transit.
If the same company were in the defense sector, they might instead configure both ends to use SHA-384 for extra assurance against sophisticated attacks.

Conclusion
SHA-256 and SHA-384 are critical components in modern cybersecurity. They protect data integrity in everything from VPNs and digital signatures to firmware updates and blockchain. The choice between them depends on the balance between performance and security requirements. OEMs like Cisco, Juniper, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, and Check Point integrate these hashing algorithms into their products to ensure the trustworthiness of transmitted and stored data.

Further Reading : Google Search – SHA-256 and SHA-384 data integrity verification

[Author]

Posts